{
  "title": "AI Training Workflow Selection Checklist",
  "version": "2026-05-24",
  "purpose": "Choose the first business workflow a team should train around before buying another AI workshop or tool.",
  "scoreScale": {
    "0": "Weak first candidate",
    "1": "Possible candidate, needs judgment",
    "2": "Strong first candidate"
  },
  "criteria": [
    {
      "id": "business_pain",
      "label": "Business pain",
      "prompt": "How obvious is the workflow pain today?",
      "score0": "Mostly a nice-to-have or curiosity.",
      "score1": "A known annoyance that slows a few people down.",
      "score2": "A repeated bottleneck owners already complain about."
    },
    {
      "id": "revenue_or_customer_impact",
      "label": "Revenue or customer impact",
      "prompt": "Does the workflow touch money, capacity, margin, retention, or customer experience?",
      "score0": "Hard to connect to a business result.",
      "score1": "Indirect impact on speed, capacity, or quality.",
      "score2": "Clear link to revenue, margin, conversion, retention, or customer experience."
    },
    {
      "id": "frequency",
      "label": "Frequency",
      "prompt": "How often does this workflow happen?",
      "score0": "Rare or seasonal.",
      "score1": "Recurring, but not weekly.",
      "score2": "Weekly or daily work the team keeps repeating."
    },
    {
      "id": "source_material_availability",
      "label": "Source material availability",
      "prompt": "Can the team bring real inputs into training?",
      "score0": "Mostly in people's heads.",
      "score1": "Some examples exist, but they need cleanup.",
      "score2": "Clear source material exists: CRM notes, tickets, calls, emails, SOPs, reports, or templates."
    },
    {
      "id": "ease_of_human_review",
      "label": "Ease of human review",
      "prompt": "Can a person quickly judge whether the AI output is usable?",
      "score0": "Review would be unclear or slow.",
      "score1": "A knowledgeable person can review with effort.",
      "score2": "The owner can review the output quickly against known standards."
    },
    {
      "id": "risk_level",
      "label": "Risk level",
      "prompt": "How bounded is the risk if the AI output is weak?",
      "score0": "It could affect money, legal exposure, sensitive data, or customer commitments without a clear stop rule.",
      "score1": "Risk is manageable if a named person reviews exceptions.",
      "score2": "Low-risk preparation work with obvious review boundaries."
    },
    {
      "id": "team_adoption_likelihood",
      "label": "Team adoption likelihood",
      "prompt": "Will the team actually use this after training?",
      "score0": "The team does not own the pain or has little reason to change.",
      "score1": "A few people are likely to use it.",
      "score2": "The people doing the work want help and can see the benefit."
    },
    {
      "id": "measurement_clarity",
      "label": "Measurement clarity",
      "prompt": "Can the business tell whether the workflow improved?",
      "score0": "No obvious baseline or result.",
      "score1": "A rough indicator exists, but it needs definition.",
      "score2": "The team can track speed, rework, completion, response time, capacity, quality, or customer movement."
    },
    {
      "id": "implementation_readiness",
      "label": "Implementation readiness",
      "prompt": "Is the workflow clear enough to turn into a repeatable process?",
      "score0": "The process is fuzzy or different every time.",
      "score1": "The workflow can be described, but triggers or owners need cleanup.",
      "score2": "Trigger, owner, inputs, output, review rule, and metric are mostly clear."
    }
  ],
  "decisionPaths": [
    {
      "path": "Train the team around this workflow",
      "typicalScore": "11-14",
      "condition": "The workflow matters, source material exists, people can review the output, and the first win is a better team habit."
    },
    {
      "path": "Fix the workflow before training",
      "typicalScore": "7-10",
      "condition": "The pain may be real, but the process, source material, owner, review rule, or metric is unclear."
    },
    {
      "path": "Move directly to implementation",
      "typicalScore": "15-18",
      "condition": "The trigger, inputs, owner, output, review rule, and metric are clear enough to scope a workflow deployment."
    },
    {
      "path": "Do not start here",
      "typicalScore": "0-6",
      "condition": "The workflow is too rare, too vague, too risky, or too far from business value to be the first training target."
    }
  ],
  "conversion": {
    "primaryCta": "Schedule a Workflow Selection Call",
    "primaryUrl": "https://www.aideploymentauthority.org/strategy-session",
    "secondaryCta": "Request a Revenue Workflow Review",
    "secondaryUrl": "https://www.aideploymentauthority.org/request-review"
  }
}